The Supreme Court has stated the Mubarak review case, emphasizing that misinterpreting judicial decisions to spread propaganda is not in the nation’s service but falls under the “Fasad Fil-Arz” (spreading disorder on earth).
In its announcement, the Supreme Court mentioned that the decision was released in Urdu to ensure the general public can easily understand it. The decision clearly states that one cannot be considered a Muslim without complete and unconditional faith in Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The court further declared that both groups of Ahmadis are considered non-Muslims according to religion, Sharia, and the Constitution. Ahmadis do not have the right to propagate their beliefs among Muslims, whether publicly or privately.
Acceptance of Punjab Government’s Review Petition
The Supreme Court accepted the Punjab government’s review petition and provided a detailed explanation of the ruling. During the review hearing, the court sought guidance from reputable Islamic institutions in Pakistan. Several individuals were allowed to submit their written arguments, and the parliamentary committee proceedings were also reviewed.
Consultation with Renowned Scholars
The court sought insights from prominent scholars such as Mufti Mahmood, Maulana Zafar Ansari, Maulana Shah Ahmad Noorani, Professor Ghafoor, and others. The writings of Maulana Syed Abul A’la Maududi and other distinguished scholars were considered in the decision. The review decision adhered to previous rulings by the Federal Shariat Court and the Supreme Court.
Condemnation of Baseless Allegations
Despite this, the decision has faced baseless accusations. The Supreme Court condemned these allegations. This point shows that those making such claims present their opinions as more credible than esteemed students’ perspectives. Which is beside the point. The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees the proper freedom of expression, but this proper can’t be used to damage the sanctity of Islam or the integrity of the nation.
Call for Responsible Conduct
The statement reiterated that misinterpreting the decision to spread propaganda is not a service to the country and falls under “Fasad Fil-Arz.” The Constitution and the law do not permit such disorderly conduct. The Supreme Court called for responsible behavior in upholding the rule of law and admiring judicial decisions.
