A member of Pakistan’s Senator, Irfan Siddiqui from the PML-N party, has recently raised some grave questions related to Article 187 of the Constitution of Pakistan and its implementation, which talks about “complete” justice. What “e is trying to say is that fairness may not always be fair; it could be partial towards individuals or parties.
The central question Senator Irfan Siddiqui
Senator Irfan Siddiqui’s principal query is whether or not this idea of “complete” justice” applies” universally but with exceptions. He questions judges’ neutrality and sees them sometimes applying double standards, where the highest levels of fairness for some instances or groups. This issue goes to the heart of the question of what role the judiciary has in promoting equity before the law.
Supreme Court Vacations and Possible Contempt Senator Irfan Siddiqui
According to him, the Supreme Court will still be on vacation until September 9; therefore, failing to implement decisions about special seats during this time will amount to contempt of court. The speed at which those particular political decisions were made and their timing make one wonder how much thought was given to judgments that affect the broader political arena.
Consequences Of The Supreme Court Decision Senator Irfan Siddiqui Â
If Senator Siddiqui implements his proposal, review petitions will become null and void because the Supreme Court’s decision will be final, just like in any other jurisdiction. No further appeal will be possible once the courier issues such an order. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully consider such rulings, especially since their effects are irreversible.
Timing Of The Decision And Subsequent Vacations Senator Irfan Siddiqui
On July 12 this year, after delivering judgment concerning reserved seats and immediately after vacationing until long holidays, all supreme courts came under fire from different quarters, including honorable members like Senator Irfan. He termed these events” saying,” They clearly show a lack of commitment by our judiciary towards constitutional duty and justice demands.
Two Judges Reject Chief Justice’Justice’stÂ
Furthermore, two Supreme Court judges rejected an argument by their chief justice that constitutional and justice demands can be sacrificed for leisure and holidays. This move seems to indicate some internal wrangling within higher courts, which raises question marks over what should come first, duties or fun when it comes to judicial work.
Broad Implications For Justice  Irfan Siddiqui
Therefore, he called for transparency, accountability, consistency, and fairness during the judicial process since failure to do so may lead to selective justice becoming the root cause of many problems within systems, even those related to good governance.
Ensuring Judicial Accountability Senator IrfanÂ
His statement calls for more accountability, especially when implementing court orders, besides putting personal interests before professional interests.
In summary: A Call for Universal Application of Justice S
In a nutshell, Senator Irfan Siddiqui’s application of “complete” justice” under “article 187 is essential regarding its inconsistency and impartiality within PakistanPakistan’sry system. His demand for universality underscores the need for an independent legal framework that promotes equality before the law based on fairness and equity along with other relevant values like transparency without any hint of biases creeping into the minds of people involved, whether viewed from afar or close home where everything happens every day frequently most times quietly behind the scenes without much fuss made until something goes wrong somewhere somehow trigger off a national debate about a same issue such as this one now before us here today.
