The Practice and Procedure Ordinance has recently generated heated discussion, leading to a challenge being filed in the Lahore High Court. This ordinance, signed by President Asif Ali Zardari, is an addition to the existing Practice and Procedure Law that provides for the arrangement of airline case schedules and bench formations in the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Legal and political controversies concerning the illegality of this development have occurred, with Leading advocate Azhar Siddique filing a petition seeking to contain its legality at the Lahore High Court.
Petition on Bill Submitted by Advocate Azhar Siddique
Advocate Azhar Siddique appears for the petitioners in this case, handled the orthopedist, and has given a detailed strategy against the ordinance in Lahore High Courts, making the central government and other concerned parties respondents. This primary reason is the most persuasive view of the ordinance, terming it ill as a politically engineered proposition. As per the petition in question interalia, the Presidential Ordinance purports to infringe upon the system’s auto systems operations of the court, specifically the Supreme Court of Justice, in whose presence such legislation has ceased. Siddique pointed out that a Supreme Court decision about the Practice and Procedure Act already makes the new ordinance dormant and, therefore, is unconstitutional.
Arguments Presented by the Petitioner Lahore High Court
The most critical argument that the petitioner relies on is that the Presidential Ordinance cannot extend or curtail the authority of the Supreme Court as legally provided. The petition expresses apprehension as to whether the ordinance interferes with running the third arm of government, which could be dangerous if the executive attempts to meddle in the judiciary processes.
Besides, the petitioner has stressed that the ordinance seems to be motivated by evils such as soliciting changes in how the Supreme Court decides cases of a high-profile nature. Such manipulation or encroachment on the judicial service could undermine the independence of the judiciary and, in effect, the people’s confidence, which is the greatest court in the country.
Request for Immediate Suspension of the Ordinance Lahore High Court
While pursuing the legal challenge to the ordinance, Advocate Azhar Siddique has requested the Lahore High Court to restrain the ordinance’s operation until the court finally decides the case. The petitioner argues that the court should limit the ordinance’s enforcement, as it may impact cases currently before the Supreme Court or those scheduled for future hearings. The petitioner further asserts that the judicial process could suffer in other instances because time is of the essence, and no more time should be wasted in preventing the ordinance from taking effect, which is simply wrong.
.
Federal Government’GovGovernment Lahore High Court
storming out loud to deflect accusations of having sought to amend the Practice and Procedure Law through an unconstitutional Presidential Ordinance quickly ends. This amendment enables restructuring of the Supreme Court’s bench Court’son and hearing time schedules for various cases.
Assenting to the Ordinance by President Asif Ali Zardari Lahore High Court
President Asif Ali Zardari signed the Practice and Procedure Ordinance into law. In this context, the legal challenge filed in the Lahore High Court could obstruct the ordinance’s execution or even lead to its quashing. However, some readers support its abrogation and the reinstatement of justice, believing that the ordinance disrupts the balance of justice, especially as the Supreme Court addresses critical issues facing the country. Critics from both the political and legal spheres perceive this situation as a significant turning point for justice.
Conclusion
The appeal against the Practice and Procedure Ordinance in the Lahore Sabzazar High Court raises more profound questions on perspective and fixed issues of checks and balances and judicial isolationism in the South African hoi polloi democracy state. As noted, the president signed this ordinance Customary Practice as an act against the various stakeholders’ stakeholders’keholders’ stakeholders’ advocates. Azhar Siddique has successfully advanced the Lahore High Court towards jurisdiction on the ordinances’ coordinances’lity and its motives for its issue, as well as the other way around.
