Upon receiving a petition involving the Sindh government and challenging Ishaq Dar’s appointment as Deputy Prime Minister, the Sindh High Court ruled in favor of the residents of SindhThe court ordered an immediate hearing of the petition, which is a positive step for those who had legal objections to the new appointment.
Chief Justice’s Inquiries Ishaq Dar’s
The petition by Ishaq Dar was first heard by the senior most judge of the Sindh high court. The fact, however, came into focus during the observations of the court reviewing the urgency to dispose this particular case on a priority basis.
The court’s decision to order an immediate hearing of the petition is a positive step for those who have legal objections to the new appointmen
Questioning the Fundamental Right Ishaq Dar’s
The Chief Justice asked the lawyer of the petitioner on what because of which many fees says has bene confined is Dar Ishaq making offending bamboo.
Therefore, it is important to determine whether anything challenged in the Constitution or legislation is a right that might be under threat.
Distribution of Power among the Government: Importance of Eastern Provincial Deputy Prime Minister
P. I. H. I SAYED, WHO is advocating for the Petitioner, submitted that the Federal Government includes, under Articles 90 and 91, only the Prime Minister and his or her Cabinet Members. He stressed out that the Constitution does not provide for deputy prime minister position, thus making Dar’s appointment controversial.
When the court put forward a question which sought to understand if there were any similarities in the appointment of Elahi and the questioning of the Deputy Prime Minister within this court, the Petitioners lawyer noted that the Elahi 2013 notification was in contrast to them.
Court’s Request for Documentation Ishaq Dar’s
The Chief Justice even requested the copy of notification about Pervez Elahi’s appointment as Deputy Prime Minister and other related high court decisions.
Inclusion of Ishaq Dar as a Party
The court also sought clarification on why Ishaq Dar was not included as a party in the petition. The petitioner’s counsel responded that if the court finds it necessary, Dar can be added to the proceedings as one of the parties. This inclusion may be important in reviewing the whole picture of the case so that all
