The court regretted the acts of the Director General (DG) Anti-Corruption. It said that this matter is very sensitive, adding that immediate recovery of the kidnapped MNA should be done. DG Anti-Corruption said they do not have weapons, and the court expressed dissatisfaction. Justice Najafi asked the DG about his integrity by saying, “How “ill people trust you? Don’t hand over suspects to your custody if you deal like this”.”
P “lice Procedures Inquiry CourtÂ
The court also asked the Inspector General (IG) of the Punjab Police about Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for such cases. The IG replied that the police have categorized suspects and support the Anti-Corruption Department in conducting raids. However, the court found no trace of the missing MNA even after six days.
Registry Office Instruction CourtÂ
In a related development, Justice Ali Baqar Najafi directed the regisregistrar’sce to fix PTI MNA Sanaullah MastiMastikhel’stion against the anti-corruption notice before another bench. Sattar Sahil, Assistant Advocate General Punjab, suggested assigning this case to Justice Shahram Sarwar Chaudhry, Justice Shahram Sarwar Chaudhry. The same judge who heard a similar case earlier.
Ongoing Worries
The stringent stance taken by it, along with the deadline set, shows just how seriously the judiciary views kidnapping cases. This raises questions about whether law enforcement agencies can deal with high-profile cases if progress has not been made within those institutions.
Case Background Information
Procedures followed by relevant authorities during the disappearance of MNA Haji Imtiaz Ahmad have come under scrutiny following widespread public outcry over his vanishing act. The involvement of several prominent political figures coupled with sensitivity surrounding this issue has complicated matters even more, thus making them urgent.
Next Move
The court has given clear directions that state that DPO Gujrat should ensure the recovery of Haji Imtiaz Ahmad by August 9. Failure to do this may lead to further legal action being taken as well as increased pressure on police departments so they can meet their obligations.
This case underscores the need for effective coordination between law enforcement agencies and transparency in handling abduction cases, particularly those involvijudiciary’sigures. The judiciary’s active participation reflects people’s protection of people’s rights, especially when other arms might fall short during such incidents.
