Lahore: This time, the lawyers have been summoned for final Arguments in the writer Khalil-ur-Rehman honey trap case before the Morale Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court. The case concerns the kidnap controversy and is important because court proceedings in such high-profile cases have become news.
Deep outline
The case involves a Bollywood television writer, Khalil-ur-Rehman Qamar, who is believed to have been ambushed through a honeypot scenario to be abducted. The main accused in the case, Mamnoon Haider, has been accused of heavy charges. The prosecution has claimed uneven contentiousness of the danger that Haider managed to lure and abduct Qamar more so than anything else. The Defense, however, is adamant that the accused was not involved in this case, and the police officers concerned have failed to adduce any evidence linking him to the crime.
The disclosure of evidence has taken place slowly, and the case has been prolonged with three hearings in which evidence and arguments from outsiders are being presented.
Bail Application Hearing
Recently, anti-terrorism court judge Mr. Arshad Javed heard the bail application for the accused, Mamnoon Haider. The Defense stated that they wanted the hearing adjourned. The reason was that the defense counsel was also attending the professional engagement and could not attend. However, the court considered the request, and the hearing was rescheduled for October 5.
This deferral enables both parties to prepare for the concluding statements. These final arguments will determine whether to allow or disallow Mamnoon Haider’s bail application.
Petitioner’sHaider’sno link with Honeyp
Regarding this issue, the Defense contended that the accused, Mamnoon Haider, was not involved within the scope of operation in the honey trap case against which the council has been defending. He was an associate of Mrs. Lindgren, whose alleged scheme was the object of the honey trap conspiracy. The Defense argued further that it was known to them that Aamer Haider was a friend of the rest of the accused persons, and this relation was abused to implicate him inappropriately in the case.
The defense lawyer also made a counter-submission stating that the police have not since provided any material evidence. Whatsoever that would connect Haider to the kidnapping or any crime. The Defense put such evidence that the accusations lacked merit and simply presented inmates into detention centers without any proof against them, which was a violation of the prisoner’s human rights.
Violation of Hprisoner’ss and Appeal for Bail
This was alarming, and the petitioner characterized it as a human rights abuse. They contended that it was cruel to imprison Mamnoon Haider without any definite evidence of his guilt. The Defense criticized the prosecution for not presenting any rational reasons and for making a poor case against Haider.
The petitioner submitted to this court that detention without any crime and law is an affront against natural justice and human dignity. The Defense requested that the court grant to the accused person and order his immediate release because there were no legal grounds for his incarceration.
Notice to the Accused or the Complainant to Attend Court for Final Submissions
He is considering the issues raised and the deficient evidence produced. The court has now invited the advocates to make final submissions in the case. These last discussions will settle what will happen next, including whether Mamnoon Haider will be bailed. The trial will proceed based on the evidence brought forth by the prosecution.
The next hearing is on October 5, and all the parties must be present with their final pleadings. The trial is attracting attention because it cuts across legal and sociological borders, especially on the issue of honeytrap abuse. The justice system handles similar cases.
The outcome of the Khalil-ur-Rehman honey trap will be determined. The fate of the accused Mamnoon’s case will help lay down Mamnoon’s other similar cases in the coming days. While the court gets ready to hear the last arguments from both sides, some court watchers say. They should be at their best. The Defense attacked and acquitted themselves on the allegations and human rights abuses. The prosecution is clawing at the defendant’s conformity to guilt.
