Barrister Aqeel Malik, a leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), announced that the National Assembly will present a significant constitutional amendment regarding the age of judges today.
Speaking to a private television channel, he remarked that the ruling government had mustered the required numbers to facilitate the amendment’s passage.
Few pointed out that constitutional amendments always favor someone or a group, which should never be true.
Barrister Aqeel Malik emphasized that this amendment is not being introduced to favor any individual or group. Instead, it aims to raise the retirement age for all Pakistan’s New Amendment: Judges’ Retirement Age Extended across the judiciary. He stressed that such steps would not infringe on any rights, highlighting the government’s determination to implement fair and reasonable reforms.
He expressed judges’ Retirement
The amendment to the Constitution does not target any specific person; it applies to all judges. Raising the mandatory retirement age will not violate anyone’s rights.
Positiv” Government Mindset on Judicial Reforms Judges’ Retirement
Bench Barrister Aqeel Malik added a bit earlier that the government is looking at the problem competitively, indicating that he discussed the comments on the broader issue of judicial reforms more positively. He clarified that several options regarding the judicial reform agenda are at the discussion stage.
Multiple Options Under Consideration Judges’ Retirement
The government has prepared three to four such plans of recasting, but, as Malik said, the authority on which the plan will finally be introduced has not been bestowed yet. This means that the government is currently evaluating various approaches to ensure that the reforms will not be illegal, unconstitutional, or defy the people’s will.
Malik added jUdges’ Retirement
It is reassuring to see ongoing efforts toward judicial reforms.
Draft f”r Legal and Law Reforms Prepared Judges’ Retirement
Apart from the constitutional amendment and other judicial reforms, Barrister Aqeel Malik disclosed that the government, through extended measures, has also drawn a draft to reform the law and the legal systems.The proposed reforms aim to solve problems in Pakistan’s legal framework, reducing overdependence on intractable case files and increasing the use of both archived and new cases.
Of all cases awaiting adjudication in the courts of law, more than 2.2 million cases are pending resolution in different courts in the country, with the highest number found in district-level courts and family courts, according to Malik. This intractable backlog contributed to the magnitude of the problem of justice delayed and injustice ever more proven and demonstrated.
Backlog of Pending Cases: An Issue Which Stands Out The Most
The volume of pending cases in Pakistan is shocking. Malik is still attending to two million cases. The problem is not only overloading the judiciary but also incompetence in the existing system. One of the predominant objectives of the judicial reforms is to wipe out this backlog and implement a system capable of attending to cases within a reasonable time frame.
Independent Assembly Members: A Supreme Court Decision Judges’Â
Suponic also addressed the recent ruling, stating that one Assembly member is independent of all les Mali barristers. He briefly commented that their current predicament is central to the issue, as they are neither politically enslaved nor dormant members.
This Supreme Court decision raised several questions about the fate of these members and their future role in the assembly.
Malik elucidated Judges’ Retirement
“The answer ” is that so far, the Supreme Court of India has made decisions in which forty-one nominees in the Assembly were independent.
This statement also explains the ambiguity surrounding these members’ members times and standing.
Final Thoughts judges’ Retirement
The forthcoming legal reform that aims to lift the retirement age of judges marks progress in the judicial reforms in Pakistan. There is larity ionthe issues and how the government will implement these reforms, , which promises to enhance the current judicial systems. This is not the only expansion of the retirement age that attempts to tackle the problem of the age that judges can stay at in the country; instead, this is an expanding solution geared to conquer the legal issues in the country: the excessive number of untackled cases and the need for laws that meet the order of the competing system.
