Federal Minister for Information Atta Tarar has recently made large allegations concerning the relationship between the founder of PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) and previous ISI Chief, Faiz Hameed. Tarar states that the two formed a strong alliance, with Hameed playing a crucial role in securing PTI’s grip on power throughout its tenure. The minister claimed that Faiz Hameed made large efforts to maintain PTI in electricity, suggesting that his involvement was now not simply advisory but became geared towards retaining PTI’s dominance inside the political area.
PTI’s Self-Portrayal as a Peaceful Party
Atta Tarar also challenged PTI’s self-identification as a peaceful political entity. He mentioned that truly claiming to be peaceful does now not routinely make a celebration so; it needs to be demonstrated through constant, nonviolent moves. Tarar cited the instance of Jamaat-e-Islami, a party acknowledged for its nonviolent protests and sit-down-ins, as a benchmark of what a sincerely nonviolent political movement looks like. He argued that PTI’s records, marred with the aid of aggressive actions and confrontations, do not align with its claims of being nonviolent. This contrast, Tarar implied, raises questions about PTI’s credibility and its dedication to non-violence.
Doubts About PTI’s Future Activities
Given PTI’s past conduct, Ata Tarar expressed scepticism about whether the party could organize future political activities without restrictions. He suggested that PTI’s historical behaviour, particularly under the influence of its founder and Faiz Hameed, would likely result in closer scrutiny by the authorities. Tarar specifically mentioned the events of May 9th, attributing them directly to the orders of PTI’s founder. These events, which led to widespread unrest, have become a focal point in the government’s critique of PTI’s tactics and strategies.
Allegations of National Harm
In his remarks, Ata Tarar did not shy away from accusing the PTI founder and Faiz Hameed of causing significant harm to Pakistan. He argued that their alleged alliance destabilized the country, affecting its political and social fabric. Tarar suggested that this collaboration could have been in the nation’s best interest and has left lasting damage that needs to be addressed. However, he acknowledged that the legal proceedings against PTI’s founder are still uncertain, as it remains unclear which court will take up the matter. Despite this uncertainty, Tarar hinted at a growing fear within PTI’s ranks, particularly concerning the potential legal consequences for its founder.
Ata Tarar’s recent statements reflect a deep concern within the government regarding PTI’s past actions and alleged connections with Faiz Hameed. By questioning PTI’s peaceful claims and highlighting the alleged harm caused by its leadership, Tarar’s remarks signal a broader apprehension about the party’s role in Pakistan’s political landscape. As these allegations’ legal and political implications continue to unfold, PTI’s future remains uncertain, with the government poised to scrutinize its every move.
